Brief Information
In a recent decision, the Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) gave a thumbs up to M/s. Portescap India Private Limited. They ruled that the company doesn't have to pay GST under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) for renting immovable property from SEEPZ SEZ or other services from domestic tariff area (DTA) suppliers, as long as they're used for authorized SEZ operations and the company provides a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) or bond. This overturns an earlier ruling and could help many SEZ units save on taxes.
Detailed About Case
This case revolves around GST rules for businesses operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in India. M/s. Portescap India Private Limited, a company based in an SEZ, was getting services like renting property from SEEPZ SEZ and other supplies from DTA providers to run their approved operations. The big question was whether they needed to pay GST on these under RCM – that's when the buyer pays the tax instead of the seller.
The company first approached the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) for clarity. But the AAR's decision wasn't in their favor, so they appealed to the AAAR. The appeal was filed against Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-93/2019-20/B-110 dated 10.12.2021. After reviewing everything, the AAAR issued Order No. MAH/AAAR/DS-RM/15/2022-23 dated 13.01.2023, which set aside the original ruling and gave a more favorable view.
View of Applicant
M/s. Portescap India Private Limited argued that as an SEZ unit, they shouldn't be hit with GST under RCM for these services. They pointed out that SEZ laws treat them as "deemed suppliers" for such transactions when they're for authorized operations. By furnishing an LUT or bond, they believed they could avoid the tax burden. Their main goal was to get confirmation that this setup keeps things tax-free, making it easier to focus on business without extra costs.
View of AAR
The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in their order GST-ARA-93/2019-20/B-110 dated 10.12.2021 didn't agree with the applicant. They likely held that GST under RCM was still applicable on these services, even for SEZ operations. This meant the company would have to pay the tax upfront, which could strain cash flow for SEZ businesses relying on zero-rated supplies.
Status of Case
The case is now settled in favor of the applicant. The AAAR has set aside the AAR's ruling and clearly stated: (i) that the Appellant are not required to pay GST under RCM on the impugned services of renting of immovable property services received from SEEPZ SEZ for carrying out the authorised operation in SEZ subject to furnishing of LUT or bond as a deemed supplier of such services; (ii) that the Appellant are not required to pay GST under RCM on any other services received from the suppliers located in DTA for carrying out the authorized operation in SEZ subject to furnishing of LUT or bond as a deemed supplier of such services. This is a win for SEZ units, but remember, it applies specifically to this scenario.
Summary
Overall, this ruling is good news for companies like Portescap in SEZs. It simplifies tax rules by confirming no GST RCM on key services from SEZ authorities or DTA suppliers, as long as they're for approved work and backed by an LUT or bond. It highlights how SEZ perks can cut down on unnecessary tax payments, boosting efficiency. If you're in a similar spot, this could set a helpful precedent.
Download Option
Comments
Post a Comment
If you have any doubts, Please let me know